Old Monk, the FSSAI, and the Seven-Year Claim That Came Apart

September 7, 2026

Written by Gautam Kannan

Bite-Sized Watercolor painting of an Old Monk rum label with a magnifying glass, the 7 Years Old text mid-smudge

Key Takeaways

Subscribe

Old Monk's famous seven-year claim has run into a problem. FSSAI says the XXX Matured Rum produced at the Khopoli unit is mostly unmatured neutral spirit, with matured rum making up less than 5 percent of the blend.

Three Old Monk variants from that unit were hit with prohibition-of-sale orders. The dispute has since reached the Bombay High Court, where FSSAI has gone further: it argues that a product built around neutral spirit and added rum flavor should be sold as a "rum-flavored spirit," not simply as rum. Mohan Rocky Springwater disputes that, saying its production complies with the rules for blended spirits.

Not a Ban, Despite the Headlines

This isn't a nationwide Old Monk ban, and it isn't a safety scare. It's an argument over what the drink can legally be called, and whether the label accurately described what drinkers were buying.

Did You Know?

Plenty of details like the ones below didn't make the cut here.
Find them in the full article.

Subscribe if you like content like this delivered weekly to your inbox.

The reporting and regulatory claims are sourced with links. Check out the Sources section for details.

Want the full story?

Read the Full Article →
← Previous Post Back to Journal